Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Format | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Flashcards

Blog Article

Tags: Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Format, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Flashcards, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Pass4sure, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Actual Questions, Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Blueprint

If your answer is yes then you need to start Channel Partner Program Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test preparation with Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF Questions and practice tests. With the PDF4Test Channel Partner Program Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Test questions you can prepare yourself shortly for the final Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 2	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 3	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

>> Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Format <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Flashcards - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Pass4sure

Do you worry about not having a long-term fixed study time? Do you worry about not having a reasonable plan for yourself? Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps will solve this problem for you. Based on your situation, including the available time, your current level of knowledge, our study materials will develop appropriate plans and learning materials. Whatever you want to choose, you want to learn from which stage. In our study materials, you can find the right one for you. At the same time, the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Prep is constantly updated. After you have finished learning a part, you can choose a new method according to your own situation. Our study materials are so easy to understand that no matter who you are, you can find what you want here.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q59-Q64):

NEW QUESTION # 59
A Generative Al Engineer has built an LLM-based system that will automatically translate user text between two languages. They now want to benchmark multiple LLM's on this task and pick the best one. They have an evaluation set with known high quality translation examples. They want to evaluate each LLM using the evaluation set with a performant metric.
Which metric should they choose for this evaluation?

A. RECALL metric
B. BLEU metric
C. ROUGE metric
D. NDCG metric

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task is to benchmark LLMs for text translation using an evaluation set with known high-quality examples, requiring a performant metric. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: ROUGE metric
* ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) measures overlap between generated and reference texts, primarily for summarization. It's less suited for translation, where precision and word order matter more.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is commonly used for summarization, not translation evaluation"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: BLEU metric
* BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) evaluates translation quality by comparing n-gram overlap with reference translations, accounting for precision and brevity. It's widely used, performant, and appropriate for this task.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU is a standard metric for evaluating machine translation, balancing accuracy and efficiency"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: NDCG metric
* NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) assesses ranking quality, not text generation.
It's irrelevant for translation evaluation.
* Databricks Reference:"NDCG is suited for ranking tasks, not generative output scoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: RECALL metric
* Recall measures retrieved relevant items but doesn't evaluate translation quality (e.g., fluency, correctness). It's incomplete for this use case.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract, but recall alone lacks the granularity of BLEU for text generation tasks.
Conclusion: Option B (BLEU) is the best metric for translation evaluation, offering a performant and standard approach, as endorsed by Databricks' guidance on generative tasks.

NEW QUESTION # 60
What is an effective method to preprocess prompts using custom code before sending them to an LLM?

A. Write a MLflow PyFunc model that has a separate function to process the prompts
B. Directly modify the LLM's internal architecture to include preprocessing steps
C. Rather than preprocessing prompts, it's more effective to postprocess the LLM outputs to align the outputs to desired outcomes
D. It is better not to introduce custom code to preprocess prompts as the LLM has not been trained with examples of the preprocessed prompts

Answer: A

Explanation:
The most effective way to preprocess prompts using custom code is to write a custom model, such as an MLflow PyFunc model. Here's a breakdown of why this is the correct approach:
* MLflow PyFunc Models:MLflow is a widely used platform for managing the machine learning lifecycle, including experimentation, reproducibility, and deployment. APyFuncmodel is a generic Python function model that can implement custom logic, which includes preprocessing prompts.
* Preprocessing Prompts:Preprocessing could include various tasks like cleaning up the user input, formatting it according to specific rules, or augmenting it with additional context before passing it to the LLM. Writing this preprocessing as part of a PyFunc model allows the custom code to be managed, tested, and deployed easily.
* Modular and Reusable:By separating the preprocessing logic into a PyFunc model, the system becomes modular, making it easier to maintain and update without needing to modify the core LLM or retrain it.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Modify LLM's Internal Architecture): Directly modifying the LLM's architecture is highly impractical and can disrupt the model's performance. LLMs are typically treated as black-box models for tasks like prompt processing.
* B (Avoid Custom Code): While it's true that LLMs haven't been explicitly trained with preprocessed prompts, preprocessing can still improve clarity and alignment with desired input formats without confusing the model.
* C (Postprocessing Outputs): While postprocessing the output can be useful, it doesn't address the need for clean and well-formatted inputs, which directly affect the quality of the model's responses.
Thus, using an MLflow PyFunc model allows for flexible and controlled preprocessing of prompts in a scalable way, making it the most effective method.

NEW QUESTION # 61
A Generative AI Engineer has been asked to design an LLM-based application that accomplishes the following business objective: answer employee HR questions using HR PDF documentation.
Which set of high level tasks should the Generative AI Engineer's system perform?

A. Create an interaction matrix of historical employee questions and HR documentation. Use ALS to factorize the matrix and create embeddings. Calculate the embeddings of new queries and use them to find the best HR documentation. Use an LLM to generate a response to the employee question based upon the documentation retrieved.
B. Calculate averaged embeddings for each HR document, compare embeddings to user query to find the best document. Pass the best document with the user query into an LLM with a large context window to generate a response to the employee.
C. Split HR documentation into chunks and embed into a vector store. Use the employee question to retrieve best matched chunks of documentation, and use the LLM to generate a response to the employee based upon the documentation retrieved.
D. Use an LLM to summarize HR documentation. Provide summaries of documentation and user query into an LLM with a large context window to generate a response to the user.

Answer: C

Explanation:
To design an LLM-based application that can answer employee HR questions using HR PDF documentation, the most effective approach is option D. Here's why:
* Chunking and Vector Store Embedding:HR documentation tends to be lengthy, so splitting it into smaller, manageable chunks helps optimize retrieval. These chunks are then embedded into avector store(a database that stores vector representations of text). Each chunk of text is transformed into an embeddingusing a transformer-based model, which allows for efficient similarity-based retrieval.
* Using Vector Search for Retrieval:When an employee asks a question, the system converts their query into an embedding as well. This embedding is then compared with the embeddings of the document chunks in the vector store. The most semantically similar chunks are retrieved, which ensures that the answer is based on the most relevant parts of the documentation.
* LLM to Generate a Response:Once the relevant chunks are retrieved, these chunks are passed into the LLM, which uses them as context to generate a coherent and accurate response to the employee's question.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Calculate Averaged Embeddings): Averaging embeddings might dilute important information. It doesn't provide enough granularity to focus on specific sections of documents.
* B (Summarize HR Documentation): Summarization loses the detail necessary for HR-related queries, which are often specific. It would likely miss the mark for more detailed inquiries.
* C (Interaction Matrix and ALS): This approach is better suited for recommendation systems and not for HR queries, as it's focused on collaborative filtering rather than text-based retrieval.
Thus, option D is the most effective solution for providing precise and contextual answers based on HR documentation.

NEW QUESTION # 62
A Generative Al Engineer is creating an LLM-based application. The documents for its retriever have been chunked to a maximum of 512 tokens each. The Generative Al Engineer knows that cost and latency are more important than quality for this application. They have several context length levels to choose from.
Which will fulfill their need?

A. context length 32768: smallest model is 14GB and embedding dimension 4096
B. context length 514; smallest model is 0.44GB and embedding dimension 768
C. context length 512: smallest model is 0.13GB and embedding dimension 384
D. context length 2048: smallest model is 11GB and embedding dimension 2560

Answer: C

Explanation:
When prioritizing cost and latency over quality in a Large Language Model (LLM)-based application, it is crucial to select a configuration that minimizes both computational resources and latency while still providing reasonable performance. Here's whyDis the best choice:
* Context length: The context length of 512 tokens aligns with the chunk size used for the documents (maximum of 512 tokens per chunk). This is sufficient for capturing the needed information and generating responses without unnecessary overhead.
* Smallest model size: The model with a size of 0.13GB is significantly smaller than the other options.
This small footprint ensures faster inference times and lower memory usage, which directly reduces both latency and cost.
* Embedding dimension: While the embedding dimension of 384 is smaller than the other options, it is still adequate for tasks where cost and speed are more important than precision and depth of understanding.
This setup achieves the desired balance between cost-efficiency and reasonable performance in a latency- sensitive, cost-conscious application.

NEW QUESTION # 63
Generative AI Engineer at an electronics company just deployed a RAG application for customers to ask questions about products that the company carries. However, they received feedback that the RAG response often returns information about an irrelevant product.
What can the engineer do to improve the relevance of the RAG's response?

A. Implement caching for frequently asked questions
B. Use a different semantic similarity search algorithm
C. Assess the quality of the retrieved context
D. Use a different LLM to improve the generated response

Answer: C

Explanation:
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, the key to providing relevant responses lies in the quality of the retrieved context. Here's why option A is the most appropriate solution:
* Context Relevance:The RAG model generates answers based on retrieved documents or context. If the retrieved information is about an irrelevant product, it suggests that the retrieval step is failing to select the right context. The Generative AI Engineer must first assess the quality of what is being retrieved and ensure it is pertinent to the query.
* Vector Search and Embedding Similarity:RAG typically uses vector search for retrieval, where embeddings of the query are matched against embeddings of product descriptions. Assessing the semantic similarity searchprocess ensures that the closest matches are actually relevant to the query.
* Fine-tuning the Retrieval Process:By improving theretrieval quality, such as tuning the embeddings or adjusting the retrieval strategy, the system can return more accurate and relevant product information.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Caching FAQs): Caching can speed up responses for frequently asked questions but won't improve the relevance of the retrieved content for less frequent or new queries.
* C (Use a Different LLM): Changing the LLM only affects the generation step, not the retrieval process, which is the core issue here.
* D (Different Semantic Search Algorithm): This could help, but the first step is to evaluate the current retrieval context before replacing the search algorithm.
Therefore, improving and assessing the quality of the retrieved context (option A) is the first step to fixing the issue of irrelevant product information.

NEW QUESTION # 64
......

As a worldwide leader in offering the best Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test torrent in the market, PDF4Test are committed to providing update information on Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions that have been checked many times by our professional expert, and we provide comprehensive service to the majority of consumers and strive for constructing an integrated service. What's more, we have achieved breakthroughs in certification training application as well as interactive sharing and after-sales service. It is worth for you to purchase our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training braindump.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Flashcards: https://www.pdf4test.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-dump-torrent.html

Report this page

LATEST DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE TEST FORMAT | DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE EXAM FLASHCARDS

Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Format | Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Flashcards